Posted on Leave a comment

Do We Really Want Socialism?

Monday through Friday I deal with different subjects in this blog. I also post my blog to my Facebook page at RFrederickRiddlesWorld. Monday’s I try to focus on issues. This week I am taking a look at Do We Really Want Socialism?
In recent years the Democratic Party has made a hard left in their vision for the future of America. There is little left of the party of Roosevelt and Kennedy. Now the Democrats are increasingly faced with a choice between a Hillary Clinton or a Bernie Sanders. In fact, although Hillary beat out Bernie (apparently with a little trickery) Bernie’s influence seems to be greater than Hillary’s. More and more the party is talking socialistic solutions or outright socialism.
Since the election of Trump we have seen what the economy can do when unleashed from burdensome regulations. In fact, the mere promise of relief from these regulations spurred the beginnings of the current thriving economy. It is almost as those industry leaders were biting at the bit hoping against hope that Trump would be elected. Shortly after his election the economy began showing signs of coming to life.
Those regulations were put in place by the Obama Administration and were essentially socialistic solutions.
According to the Simple English Wikipedia: Socialism is an economic system where the ways of making a living (factories, offices, etc.) are owned by a society as a whole, meaning the value made belongs to everyone in that society, instead of a group of private owners. People who agree with this type of system are called socialists.
To put it simply, that means if you own a mom and pop store and manage after a lot of hard work to make a profit that profit must be shared with the community. Or perhaps you are a factory worker putting in 8, 10, or 12 hours of work, maybe including weekends yet your income will be shared by your neighbor who could be but isn’t working anywhere. After all, everyone is supposed to be equal.
In other words, there is no reward or incentive for work.
Oh, they make that sound good. Universal coverage! But the question is who pays for it. They will tell you the rich, but the ugly truth is that eventually you pay for it. That payment could come in the form of unemployment, higher taxes, and higher costs. It could also cost in the way your health is managed. Forget having any personal control, nor your doctor having the final say. It will be some board or individual, a stranger that has no more interest in you than in any statistic.
Did ObamaCare reduce costs? No. In fact by the time the Trump Administration had taken office ObamaCare was already suffering because of increased premiums, especially upon younger people. While ObamaCare still exists the Trump Administration has been able to tweak it here and there. One such tweak was to eliminate the ACA Individual Mandate beginning in 2019. It is true the Congressional Budget Office estimates a rise in costs, but take a closer look at this supposedly nonpartisan entity. First, is it even possible to be nonpartisan? That is doubtful, at best. Second, the CBO tends to exam submissions by expectations that the Left provides. I think the CBO would be more honest if their critiques were based on expectations of the entity submitting the material to be analyzed. Or perhaps in the spirit of transparency they provide dual analysis by comparing the costs in the expected economies that the Democratic and the Republican parties assume.
While there are some glowing positives (in Canada for example) there are major problems. In Canada not everything is covered. Doctor and hospital visits are covered, but that is not so for prescription drugs, dentistry, vision care, rehabilitative service and home health care. While this is similar to the U.S. Canadians have the added problem of long wait times for non-emergency, specialty procedures like knee and hip replacements and non-urgent advanced imaginghigher than those in America. And, for those of us getting older, long wait times can be a major problem!
Socialism is repressive. It was a major part of Communism. There have been reports that in China (a Communist country) whenever they have relaxed the rules and allowed some capitalism the economy has benefited. The problem with capitalism is that it thrives in a free country where everyone has the opportunity to succeed whether it’s a little girl selling lemonade or a multimillionaire investing money. Socialism is against both. By the way, children selling lemonade, etc. have been forced out of business by cities with overreaching socialistic governments.
It could be argued that the little capitalism that was allowed in the old Soviet Union contributed to its downfall. The desire for freedom can never be fully suppressed. Humans are willing to make big sacrifices just to be free. Our own founding fathers risked and in many cases lost their wealth and health, and in some cased lost family members and their own lives. All to be free.
ARE YOU A BOOK REVIEWER? I am always looking for book reviews. Whether it is Perished The World That Was (Book One), World of Noah and the Ark (Book Two), World of Shem (Book Three), World of Abraham (Book Four) or Death Ship (Book One), Pauline A New Home (Book Two), or Task Force Hunter (Book Three), I value your reviews.
If you would like to review any of these books contact me at with the subject line indicating that desire. An example of an appropriate subject line would be: ‘Seek to review [book Title].’ In the email make sure to indicate your email address, your name, and the choice of copy (PDF or ePub).

– – – – – – –

R Frederick Riddle is the author of several books and is best known for Christian Historical Fiction. For more information on him or his books visit his Amazon Authors Page. He is also co-founder and Vice President of T&R Independent Books where his books are featured. To reply to any blog you have the option of commenting on a blog and/or sending an email to You may also be interested in his Facebook page at RFrederickRiddlesWorld.